« MCE Releases One Terabyte Hard Drive Kit for 17" MacBook Pro (Updated) | Home | Earthlink to Dismantle Philadelphia's Wi-Fi Initiative »
May 14, 2008
The Apple Core: Psystar's Mac Clone Receives Initial Benchmark Testing
PowerPage head honcho Jason O'Grady recently sat down and compared the new Psystar Mac clone to a Mac Mini as well as all three MacBook laptops.
The results are a bit surprising and Jason's got the full details over at the Apple Core.
Which brings about another question: has anyone here picked up Psystar's new machine and what do they think of it? Let us know over in the comments or forums.
Posted by chrisbarylick at May 14, 2008 8:20 AM
Category: The Apple Core
Tags: Apple, benchmarks, clone, Jason O'Grady, laptops, Mac, MacBook, Psystar, the core
Buy from: Apple, iTunes
, Amazon
.
Digg This |
Post to del.icio.us |
Post to Furl
- USB Hub May Affect iPhone/iPod Touch Sync Time
- Apple Patent Highlights Upcoming Multi-Touch Technologies
- Next-Gen iPod Nano, iPod Touch Design Drawings Leaked
- Apple, AT&T Named in Bandwidth Suit
- AT&T Cites East Coast Data Issues as Repaired
- Macessity Introduces LapTuk Stand for Apple Notebooks
- Adobe to Release CS4 Details in September 23rd Webcast
- Apple, China Mobile Still in Negotiations After a Year
- AT&T, Sierra Wireless Release USBConnect Mercury 3G Peripheral
- Apple Releases Invitations for September 9th Event
- Google Outlines Chrome Web Browser Project
- MegaFon Confirms iPhone 3G Deal for Russian Market
- Apple May Cut 15% of iPhone 3G Price in India
- O2 Offers "Pay & Go" Details for UK Customers
- MacBook Hard Drive Update Guide Posted
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.powerpage.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/11297
Comments
Not really a fair comparison if you don't point out what hard drive and graphics cards were present in both test subjects. The results for CPU based tests show the Mac mini a tad better than the Pystar when you divide by their respective CPU speeds. The areas where the Mac mini did poorly could be attributed to the hard drive size (i.e. 2.5" vs. 3.5" and spindle speed), and the fact that it uses the Intel integrated graphics with shared memory over what the Pystar has.
Posted by: Erik V at May 14, 2008 12:32 PM










