« VLC Media Utility for iPhone Hits Beta | Home | VMWare Releases Fusion 1.1.3 »
June 4, 2008
Rumor: Apple to Drop PowerPC Architecture Support in Mac OS X 10.6
Despite the overwhelming focus on a possible 3G iPhone announcement at next week's Worldwide Developers' Conference in San Francisco next week, a new rumor has posited that Apple will already have a new version of Mac OS X available for testing at the event. An additional rumor has stated that the operating system upgrade could launch as early as Macworld 2009.
According to AppleInsider, Apple will be seeding a rough version of its Mac OS X 10.6 operating system to developers attending the conference. The upgrade may see manufacturing as early as December and ship in January of 2009.
Similar to Mac OS X 10.1,, the release would more closely resemble a maintenance release than a complete overhaul. The primary change would be a complete transition to an Intel-only, 64-bit platform that drops PowerPC support, pushing developers to code only for the x86 architecture at the heart of all Macs released from 2006 onwards.
Apple has refrained from commenting on the situation, though the company has dropped an early signs that it may be prepping for 10.6 development via a mention of the upcoming operating system appearing in the latest build of the iPhone software development kit, the most recent version of which appeared last week.
Apple has also alluded to next week's WWDC as a landmark event in "more ways than one," with bridge imagery suggesting two bridges to cross at the San Francisco gathering.
If you're still using a PowerPC-based Mac, love it dearly and wanted to wait a while longer before moving over to Intel-based hardware, let the screaming begin over in the comments or forums.
Posted by chrisbarylick at June 4, 2008 8:50 AM
Category: Rumor
Tags: 10.6, Apple, architecture, drop, Intel, iPhone, Mac, OS X, PowerPC, San Francisco, software development kit, worldwide developers conference, WWDC, x86
Buy from: Apple, iTunes
, Amazon
.
Digg This |
Post to del.icio.us |
Post to Furl
- Apple Manufactures 10 Millionth iPhone
- iPhone OS 2.2 Beta Points Towards Google Street View, Auto-Correction Support
- Telcel Now Offering Contract-Free iPhone 3G for Mexican Marketplace
- Fring VOIP Application Arrives for iPhone
- Rumors Point Towards Nvidia-Equipped MacBook on October 14th
- Techspansion Closes Its Doors, VisualHub, AudialHub and iSquint Discontinued
- Rogers, Fido Offer New iPhone Plans
- Apple TV 2.2 Update Out the Door
- Apple Releases iTunes 8.0.1 Update
- iTunes Store to Remain Uninterrupted as Royalty Rates Remain Unchnanged
- PowerPage Podcast Episode 92
- Apple Settles iBook, PowerBook Notebook Adapter Case
- Apple Files Cursor-Based QuickLook, Advanced Function Patent
- Sonnet Announces Aria Extreme N 802.11n PCI Card
- Travelers' Privacy Protection Act Introduced in House and Senate
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.powerpage.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/11362
Comments
There is no reason to expect 10.6 in January 09.
OS X 10.0 = March 2001
OS X 10.1 = September 2001 - 6 months
OS X 10.2 = August 2002 - 11 months
OS X 10.3 = October 2003 - 14 months
OS X 10.4 = April 2005 - 18 months
OS X 10.5 = October 2007 - 30 months
If you look at the trend you'll see that each release takes longer. Based on this history it is there will be no 10.6 at MacWorld SF January 2009.(thought i think this is a possibility for jan 2010). I'm betting on WWDC June 2010 being the ship time for 10.6. This would put it at 32 months of development time.
So far as the end of the PowerPC, i agree with this given a June 2010 estimated ship date for 10.6. However, I doubt they'll kill 32 bit intel support until 10.7. They were still shipping some 32 bit systems as of mid 07 at least. (Mac Mini) Then again they are Apple so they may bone the 32 bit users but I'm gonna put my money on 64 bit only at 10.7.
Bottom-line, 10.6 at WWDC June 2010 with Intel only support, 32 bit, 64 bit.
10.7 with 64 bit only support.
This is a reasonable guess.
Posted by: Joshua at June 4, 2008 1:01 PM
One more thing...
The other reason to discount the 64 bit only non-sense for 10.6 is because Leopard still uses 32 bit drivers. This means that most mac drivers are still 32 bit. They are not about to make a drastic transition like this so soon. We all know how well that went down in Windows land. NOTHING would work without serious developer contribution and everyone would be pissed. 10.7 for 64 bit. That gives much more time to do 64 bit drivers.
Posted by: Joshua at June 4, 2008 1:09 PM
Also, i know someone might say, well... they can still require 64 bit hardware and still use 32 bit drivers in 10.6. This is true, however, combined with the first argument I still think it is absolutely unreasonable to assume 64 bit only support in 10.6.
If they did this their users would march on Cupertino and demand Steve's head on a platter. Its not gonna happen.
Posted by: Joshua at June 4, 2008 1:15 PM










