« MacBook Pro Benchmarks (Update2) | Home | The Apple Core: MacBook Pro Photoshop Benchmarks »
February 21, 2006
MacBook Pro Battery Benchmarks (Update 6)
I did my first real test of the controversial MacBook Pro battery today.
I wanted to test the MBP battery in an unattended scenario because I have not yet migrated my data over from my PowerBook G4 1.5GHz and I needed to be productive today on my main machine. Another thing to keep in mind is that the new MacBook Pro battery has not yet been calibrated according to the instructions in the MBP User's Guide.
Page 24 of the User Guide recommends calibrating the MBP battery as folllows:
- Fully charge the battery until the power plug turns green
- Let it "rest" for two hours (keeping it plugged into AC power)
- Disconnect the adapter and run the battery down (until it goes to sleep)
- Let it sleep for at least 5 hours (or longer)
- Connect it to power and charge it all the way up
Test 1:
- Screen brightness: 12 bars out of 16 (75%)
- Energy saver > Sleep:
- Put computer to sleep when inactive - Never
- Put the display to sleep when inactive - Never
- Put the hard disk to sleep when possible - Unchecked
- Energy saver > Options:
- Automatically reduce brightness - Unchecked (two places)
- Airport/WiFi - On
- Bluetooth - On (BT mouse connected)
During this time I used the machine very lightly. I launched a bunch of the bundled applications (more on launch times later) and clicked around in them a little but then I went back to using my PowerBook G4 for a while. Periodically I would go back to the MBP and click around a bit, load some Web pages, but I was not using it in a true "production" mode.
Test 1 Results:
MacBook Pro (2.0GHz, 2GB RAM, 100GB HDD):
- Estimated: 3 hours, 7 minutes (via the menu bar)
- Battery warning: 2 hours, 30 minutes
- Involuntary sleep: 2 hours, 38 minutes
PowerBook G4 (1.5GHz, 2GB RAM, 120GB HDD):
- Estimated: 2 hours, 53 minutes (via the menu bar)
- Battery warning: 2 hours, 9 minutes
- Involuntary sleep: 2 hours, 19 minutes
Test 1 Notes
This test was not exactly a scientific test as I wasn't actively using the machine (which should help battery life) yet I had both wireless technologies on and the monitor set not to dim (which should hurt battery life). This was merely meant to be a first test at how long the MacBook Pro can hold a charge in one scenario.
Test 2:
- Energy Saver > Optimization > Normal
- Screen brightness: 8 bars out of 16 (50%)
- Energy Saver > Sleep:
- Put computer to sleep when inactive - 10 mins
- Put the display to sleep when inactive - 10 mins
- Put the hard disk to sleep when possible - Checked
- Energy Saver > Options:
- Automatically reduce brightness - Checked (two places)
- Airport/WiFi - On
- Bluetooth - On
Test 2 Results:
MacBook Pro (2.0GHz, 2GB RAM, 100GB HDD):
- Battery warning: 2 hours, 43 minutes
- Involuntary sleep: 2 hours, 51 minutes
Test 2 Notes
During this test I installed several applications from CD-ROM which uses extra energy but only for less than an hour. The rest or the time was spent running Photoshop benchmarks (about 30 minutes) and surfing the Web.
To-Do:
- Full battery calibration (in progress)
- Test other battery usage scenarios: (DVD playback, "Internet cafe mode", typical active use)
Please keep in mind that it takes three hours to charge and three hours (give or take) to exhaust a MacBook battery, so these results won't all be completed tonight. I will post more benchmarks as I get them.
MBP battery FAQs:
Q. How does it compare to the PowerBook 15-inch battery?
A. See results above.
Q. How long does it take to charge?
A. The MBP battery takes almost exactly three hours to fully charge when shut down. I have not yet timed re-charing while asleep or while running.
Q. Have you tried Coconut Battery?
A. Christoph Sinai's amazing Coconut Battery did not run on the MacBook Pro (despite it being Universal), I have emailed him about it.
If you have any suggestions fo other battery benchmarks you'd like to see post them in the comments below.
Posted by jasonogrady at February 21, 2006 11:15 AM
Category: MacBook Pro
Digg This |
Post to del.icio.us |
Post to Furl
- Apple Begins Licensing Mini DisplayPort for Free
- VMWare Offering "Cyber Monday" Deal
- iTunes 8.0.2 Purchase Bug Located, Workaround Discovered
- Windows Vista Service Pack 2 Update Expected Next April
- Battech Releases iPower SX Solar Charger
- Bevy of Deals Located on App Store
- Black Friday Deals Located for Assorted Apple Products
- Cocktail 4.2.1 (Leopard Edition) Released
- Happy Thanksgiving From O'Grady's PowerPage!
- Sonnet Releases Simply Fast FireWire 800 to FireWire 400 Adapter
- QuickTime 7.5.5 Update Allows for Secure Digital iTunes Playback via DisplayPort
- Microsoft Offering Black Friday Deal on Office 2008 for Mac: Special Media Edition
- Apple to Match Holiday Prices for "Authorized Resellers"
- Aisles of Geekdom: A Return Trip
- Best Buy Announces Collaboration with Apple, Four Day Sale on Mac Product Line
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.powerpage.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/8635
Comments
158 minutes? That blows. But this also begs the question: is the new, brighter screen @ 75% still brighter than the G4 screen at 100%? If so, I wonder what the MBP battery life is with the screen brightness turned down to a level that approximates 75% on the G4?
Posted by: Zach at February 21, 2006 11:57 AM
I know it is a debated topic, but isn't it still recommended to run your battery into the ground, then charge it while the machine is not running? repeat a few times? i just got a non-Apple long life ibook battery last year and they still recommend that for the most fun.
Posted by: otto at February 21, 2006 12:01 PM
I would love to know the battery time surfing/downloading on the internet (wirelessly), no bluetooth, to test the sitting in an aiport, coffee shop, wi-fi only scenario. Thanks!
Posted by: Rich at February 21, 2006 12:20 PM
Very intresting comparation!
If you can, could be intresting test the battery life of MPB running only rosetta application.
I mean, if i had to work with Photoshop, or any of CS application, i can do that only in rosetta, till 2007!
Posted by: Pier Luigi at February 21, 2006 12:27 PM
Try testing it under more conventional settings, for example, set Power-saving hard drive spin down "on" and use it as you normally would... web browsing and the works.
Posted by: Kevin at February 21, 2006 12:29 PM
Hi,
Could you do the real calibration process and then put all energy saving options "on", screen to minimum and Airport to "on" and BLuetooth to "off" to get a more realistic scenari for people on the road ?
Thank you
Fabrice
Posted by: Fabrice DI MEGLIO at February 21, 2006 12:37 PM
Does anyone know if it is possible to swap batteries while the MacBook Pro is in Sleep Mode?
Posted by: ll350 at February 21, 2006 12:43 PM
Could you give us feedback on how long the macbook lasts when put into "Better Battery Life" and a DVD is playing?
Also does the MacBook share the same capability of the last generation Powerbook where an end user can swap batteries without turning it off if they simply shut the LCD before taking the battery off.
Posted by: Lane at February 21, 2006 12:48 PM
While it's nice to have some benchmark, I think you'll done just about the "worst case scenario" for battery usage here. Not "using" the machine will have a minor effect on the battery life compared to running the screen at 75% and never letting the HD spin down. My bet is "using" it will only knock 10 minutes or so off the battery life. Dimming the screen more, letting it dim automatically, and allowing the HD to spin down could get you into the 3 hour range. Either way this is basically comparable to what I see on my G4 laptop now.
Posted by: Kyle Johnson at February 21, 2006 1:08 PM
How is the AirPort reception? did the redesign help any?
I miss great battery life.
Posted by: Jeff at February 21, 2006 1:46 PM
lithium polymer batteries need to go through a few cycles before they are "broken in". Your numbers should improve then.
Posted by: Anon E. moose at February 21, 2006 1:47 PM
I would like to see a test where you end up with decent battery life!
But seriously, if the screen is as bright as it's supposed to be, it should be readable at less than 50% brightness. I'd like to see a so called "normal use" test where you turn off bluetooth, leave wireless on, allow the HD to spin down when possible, have the screen dimmed as low as possible while still acceptable for reading. In other words, I'm at a coffee shop, I want my battery to last as long as possible while browsing the web through their wifi (maybe playing music through headphones the whole time as well). Does that make sense?
Apparently, they haven't implemented any kind of processor performance option (like on the g4 PB)? That could make a big difference when it becomes available (I hope).
Posted by: Joseph at February 21, 2006 1:54 PM
So what does everyone think? Is this acceptable? Sounds a lot lower than the powerbooks but maybe those numbers are with the screen as low as possible and all wireless turned off .
Posted by: Chris Rose at February 21, 2006 1:58 PM
That's quite good ... But I think that with both hard disk sleep and screen brightness reduction it should be better, don't you ?
Posted by: Tchewy at February 21, 2006 2:24 PM
This rocks, while all you kiddies are going gaga over a hyped up midrange pc (macbookyuck), I will be able to grab real macs (powerbooks) at rock bottom prices. Keep up the illusion suckers.
Maybe it is just me, but the way you did this test is extremely bizarre. What exactly were you trying to measure, because it certainly wasn't the maximum battery life and it certainly wasn't the minimal battery life?
Posted by: Jonathan at February 21, 2006 5:25 PM
How hot does it get, compared to PBG4? My old 1 GHz TiBook has "good enough" performance but it is way too hot to have in my lap.
Posted by: Joel at February 21, 2006 5:33 PM
coconutbattery crashes on my mbp. i'm calibrating my battery as we speak. gonna drain a couple of times today and then do some tests tomorrow.
Posted by: bwana at February 21, 2006 6:19 PM
What would be cool if you could recharge, and do a direct side by side comparison of a 15" G4. Just let them play a movie or something.
BC
Posted by: Barry Coyle at February 21, 2006 6:53 PM
Quick question: you wrote "current PB G4," but I am pretty sure the final PBG4 at 1.67 increased battery life in idle by a significant amount. Your is a 1.5 GHz, so probably would get about 1/2 hour less than the "current PBG4."
Am I missing something?
Posted by: Edmund Pirali at February 21, 2006 8:12 PM
In addition to running that test against a PB G4, I'd love to see how that compares to a new Duo Core Dell.
Posted by: John M. Stafford at February 22, 2006 10:39 AM
I have better numbers from my MacBook. I didn't rigorously test/time the battery and it's more of a real-world experience. I unpacked mine and plugged it in to charge right before having to go out for dinner. The MBP charged for about 2 hours out of the box. Once I got home, I used it for about 2 hours plugged in. Then I took it upstairs and it ran on battery power. I used the MBP for close to 3 hours on the "Normal" settings and then went to bed. Instead of sleeping around midnight, I went to bed around 3am. During the 3 hours, I was emailing, webbrowsing and downloading universal binaries. This morning the system had another 20 minutes left.
Posted by: Jimmy at February 22, 2006 3:36 PM
Hello:
Let's end some of the speculation of what too expect, let's look at some other Duo Core Intel laptops like the new Compaq V2000T Duo Core with 14Inch Screen: The standard 6-cell battery runs for up to 2 hours and 54 minutes per charge. With the optional 12-cell battery, the V2000T can run for up to 7 hours and 20 minutes. They sell both 6 Cell Lithium Ion or 12 Cell Lithium Ion Batteries and offer the X-Brite Screens like Sony's VAIO® FE590PB 15.4 Inch Duo Core: Standard Lithium-ion Battery, Estimated Battery Life Standard Battery: 2.0-4.0 hours.
I think this says alot about the MacBook Pro Battery Life and besides, what RoadWarrior doesn't own a few batteries? * Battery time estimates come from product's respective website. no real world testing was done on my part.
Posted by: stu at February 23, 2006 7:07 AM
"This rocks, while all you kiddies are going gaga over a hyped up midrange pc (macbookyuck), I will be able to grab real macs (powerbooks) at rock bottom prices. Keep up the illusion suckers."
shad, I think you are the one that is being delusional, why not say that real macs are only 68k-based? The MBP appears to be a far faster computer without being throttled by the G4, and still have better run time. As it sits, the only reason to stick with the Powerbook is if you need to use Adobe software.
Posted by: JeffDM at February 23, 2006 1:11 PM
Can you run it with only one core active? And would that improve the battery performance much?
Posted by: aram at February 24, 2006 1:06 PM
I was hopeing for the battery to last at least 4 hours.
Posted by: Valentino at February 24, 2006 7:52 PM
It's pointless to do all this detailed testing without callibrating the battery. The process for this in the latest PowerBooks and the MacBook is relatively complicated and probably worth doing. On my PowerBook 15" I was seeing similar times to these until I callibrated the battery and I now routinely get over 3 hours (I have not yet had a situation away from power when I have had to stop working so I don't know how much longer it can go on a charge).
Posted by: Philip Machanick at February 25, 2006 7:47 PM
The folks at www.batterygeek.net have just introduced several brand new external power solutions for all the new MacBook 13 inch and MacBook Pro laptops.
In order for thier laptop battery solution to work however you must request from them the custom MacBook connector cable and tip at the time of your order.
I bought thier new highest capacity 140Wh Portable Power Station model which is compatible with my MacBook Pro and powers it for over 6 hours.
Here are a couple of product reviews on the new BatteryGeek Portable Power Stations:
Providing my Sony UX-180p over 20 hours of battery life!
-by David Ciccone from Mobility Today
http://mobilitytoday.com/articles/portable_power_station.html
Get powered up on the go with the Portable Power Station
-by Matthew Miller from ZDNet’s The Mobile Gadgeteer
http://blogs.zdnet.com/mobile-gadgeteer/?p=30
Posted by: Antonio at September 24, 2006 5:21 PM

![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.powerpage.org/nav-commenters.gif)
