Microsoft bombshell: no EFI support for Vista

Posted by:
Date: Friday, March 10th, 2006, 11:27
Category: Uncategorized

Digg: Microsoft revealed today that it will not support EFI booting for Windows Vista on its launch. The news will be a shock for owners of Intel Macs who had hoped they would be able to dual-boot between Windows Vista and OS X. Intel Macs only support booting via EFI.
Click through to Digg for the links…

(more…)

Preview of Mac OS 10.5 (Leopard) Thanks to the USPTO

Posted by:
Date: Friday, March 10th, 2006, 11:01
Category: Uncategorized

Apple can be cagey but they can’t hide, thanks to the wonders of the badly in need of reform U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
Hrmph.com has posted some interesting details (more deets) from some patents that Apple filed for Spotlight. They expose aspects of the Finder previously unseen.

Apple is expected to release the next version of OS X – 10.5 “Leopard” by the end of 2006 or early 2007. Little information has leaked about Leopard but rumours suggest that the Finder of OS X 10.5 (code named ‘Chardonnay’) is going to depend heavily on Spotlight (Apple’s metadata and search tool).
Improvements to the Finder include:
- New Spotlight User Interface
- Hierarchical Nested “Smart Folders”
- (More) Human Readable Search Queries
- Better metadata creation- OCR, voice recognition

Expect a preview of the new OS at WWDC 2006 which runs from August 7-11 in San Francisco.

(more…)

Ask PowerPage: Universal Binary Browsers

Posted by:
Date: Wednesday, March 8th, 2006, 22:21
Category: Uncategorized

Dear PowerPage:
I’m just wondering about Firefox on the new MBP. Does Firefox have to use Rosetta, or is there a native version available. If there is no native version yet, what speed does it seem to work at?
Thanks,
Chris


Hello Chris,
Currently Firefox 1.5.0.1 is a PowerPC application which means that it must run in Rosetta emulation on the Intel Macs. However I have found an excellent alternative in Deer Park an alpha release of the next generation Firefox browser which runs natively on Apple’s Intel Macs.
Unfortunately, my favorite browser Flock isn’t yet Universal Binary.
Best,
Jason

What Universal Binary browser are you using these days? Why?

(more…)

REVIEW: Griffin TuneFlex Car Mount and Charger

Posted by:
Date: Tuesday, March 7th, 2006, 21:57
Category: Uncategorized

griffin-nanoflex.jpgGriffin Technology’s TuneFlex is a combination auto charger/flexible docking cradle for the iPod nano. It’s perfect for jamming to your nano in the car especially if you don’t have a good place to leave it (i.e. a cup holder) while driving.
TuneFlex has a flexible steel neck that adjusts to any angle making it visible from any vantage point. A light at the base of TuneFlex’s neck shows power status and a fuse keeps your iPod safe from spikes.
TuneFlex features a built-in 1/8″ stereo line-out connector (for attaching cassette adapters or cables) and it also includes a pass-through dock connector that lets you attach any accessory (including the iTrip, AirClick or SmartDeck cassette adapter among others.
TuneFlex is available in black for the iPod nano for US$40 from Griffin Technology.

Technorati Tags:

(more…)

Update on the Nokia E61

Posted by:
Date: Friday, March 3rd, 2006, 18:43
Category: Uncategorized

Well this is a bummer, man. A major bummer.

The Nokia E61 that I mentioned earlier? Well it finally got FCC Approval but I’m told that the device is set for a limited launch outside of the US for the first few weeks while the final bugs are ironed out.

Part of me wonders if this talk of bugs are legit, since Sony Ericsson and Nokia have both been very timid about releasing devices that support BlackBerry Connect in the United States while RIM and NTP go at it tooth and nail in courtrooms across the United States.

Further updates as events warrant.

Technorati Tags: ,

(more…)

Intel Mac Mini Graphics Surprise

Posted by:
Date: Tuesday, February 28th, 2006, 15:04
Category: Uncategorized

The change from ATI Radeon 9200 graphics card to integrated Intel Graphics is more than a bit puzzling to me.

Ok, so the integrated Intel has 64MB as opposed to the Radeon’s 32MB. But Apple has thrown us a curve. Not only is the Intel Graphics “shared”, Apple states “1. Memory available to Mac OS X may vary depending on graphics needs. Minimum graphics memory usage is 80MB, resulting in 432MB of system memory available.”.

Am I reading this right? Minimum graphics usage requires more than Apple has provided for with their Intel integrated graphics? So, the most system memory you will ever have available is 432MB instead of the 512MB advertised.

Can someone explain to me how this is an improvement and why the same Mac OS X that worked with a 32MB graphics card now requires at least 80MB?

(more…)

Response to PowerPage Counterpoint

Posted by:
Date: Tuesday, February 28th, 2006, 13:49
Category: Uncategorized

Scott raises some interesting points. By Apple continuing to control all Mac hardware unilaterally, one weakness in the Mac platform is that all CPUs come from one source: Apple. Unlike the Windows domain, if Apple doesn’t see fit to produce it, it likely will not be made.
Case in point: look at all the funky tablet-style laptops with twist-around LCDs. While one could argue this is an unproven niche market (or worse, quite possibly a fad), the fact that all Mac hardware comes from one source means if Apple doesn’t devote the resources to entering such a niche/fad, Mac users will never see it. Of course, there are some really weird niche products in the Windows domain that Mac users can live without: notebooks that still weigh over 8 pounds come to mind.
Perhaps Apple would argue that cloning didn’t work in the mid-1990′s. Maybe it simply wasn’t in Apple’s best interest to allow cloning to continue. As for the notion of a laptop “nano”, I could see Apple entering that market IF flash memory catches up with hard disks to the point where laptops don’t need HDDs anymore. I’m still dubious about a computer without an optical drive, though.
One point where I will disagree with Jason is on FireWire. I do not see any evidence of that technology’s “death”, immediate or pending. I would think the evidence Jason points to (iPods going USB-only, MacBook Pro with only one FireWire 400 port and no FW800 to be found) can be interpreted very differently. iPods and FireWire are nice, but Apple’s key to wooing users of cheap, crappy PCs to buying the little music players was the advent of USB 2.0. As for the MacBook Pro, I can tell you that those who use multiple FireWire peripherals have discovered the hard way that it is best to “split the bus”, in other words, if a notebook user has a digital camcorder and a FireWire hard disk that (s)he wants to use at the same time, the card slot on the MacBook is a welcome means of having an extra FireWire input that isn’t competing for bandwidth on the same bus as the MacBook’s built-in FireWire port.
On Scott Shephard’s “Inside Mac TV” video podcasts for Jan. 5, 2006 (“Getting the Mac Ready for Video Editing”) and Dec. 23, 2005 (“Gary Adcock’s Dual FireWire Bus Tip”), Scott discusses ways to use either separate FireWire buses or both FireWire and USB to improve performance during video editing. This makes both FireWire and USB indispensable to amateur video editors.
So what does all this suggest about FireWire vs. USB, and why is there no FireWire 800 on the MacBook Pro? Simply put, Jason is right and wrong at the same time. The absence of FireWire 800 on the MacBook Pro is a statement about FireWire. Apple is just not saying what Jason concluded. The lack of additional FireWire ports (or FireWire 800) was Apple’s way of saying “if you need more ports or if you need FireWire 800, buy a card and use it on the card’s bus.”
I am doubtful that FireWire 400 will die any time soon. Too many camcorders, hard disks, and high-end peripherals use it, some of them exclusively. If FireWire is to be replaced with a new standard, you will hear plenty of noise being made by a broad coalition of big-name players in the camcorder and computer peripheral manufacturing industries.
Just my 2 cents. You can wake up now.

(more…)

PowerPage Counterpoint

Posted by:
Date: Tuesday, February 28th, 2006, 09:27
Category: Uncategorized

I’ve been a loyal reader of PowerPage since I was hammering away on my PowerBook Duo 210 (running a 14.4k modem – with the “do not load images” option on) back in 1995. I don’t think that I disagreed with our illustrious host’s columns or comments much until the past couple of years.
The first time that I can really remember feeling strongly enough to write in (even though I didn’t) was when the iPod shuffle arrived on the scene. I couldn’t have disagreed more with Jason’s initial assessment of it – even though as I recall he recounted enjoying it in the gym sometime later. The Shuffle was the first iPod that I bought (a 512Mb) because I just didn’t want to blow dough on something more that I really didn’t need at the time. I like technology just as much as any other reader of “the Page”, yet I prefer to hold off as long as possible until I actually feel that I need something.
I don’t own a cell phone, and my Palm from 2000 has been gathering dust for a few years now. I suppose that I represent a tech-savvy guy with some Luddite tendencies as I sit here typing on my PowerBook G4 though my wireless network. Anyways, I am interested in this new PP feature, since I often have found that since the “shuffle incident” I feel that my ideas are running counterpoint to Jason’s.
Jason would love to see a PowerBook… er… MacBook nano (man, do I dislike that new name!), and while I think this is a good idea, I would quite likely be more interested in a MacBook BIGGER than 17″. I am an artist and I want/need portability and a big screen. Get a 19″ MacBook Pro into my lap and I may change my mind! This is just one example, but it does demonstrate the differences between us. I look forward to continued jousting.
Contributed by: Scott Culley
Join in on the debate! Post your article suggestion, or point/counterpoint piece via the PowerPage’s spankin’-new Get Published page. Fame and fortune await!

(more…)

Apple "Tablet" For Sale on eBay

Posted by:
Date: Saturday, February 11th, 2006, 20:31
Category: Uncategorized

ibook-tablet.JPGApple has filed with the US Patent & Trademark Office for four patents that relate to tablet computing leading to rumors that the company is developing a tablet-based Mac. The patents include:
1) Gestures for touch sensitive input devices
2) Mode-based graphical user interfaces for touch sensitive input devices
3) Touch-sensitive electronic apparatus for media applications, and methods therefor
4) Visual expander
Touch sensitive input could be used in any number of devices including a tablet computer, iPod, mobile phone/smartphone and PDAs. You can read more about the patents on MacRumors.com. Hrmph.com has posted photos from the gesture patent depicting a user using gestures on a tablet user interface.
If you can’t wait for Apple to release a tablet-based Mac you grab one today from…
Read More…

(more…)

Dot Mac, Apple Store Temporarily Unavailable

Posted by:
Date: Tuesday, January 10th, 2006, 12:04
Category: Uncategorized

Dot Mac and The Apple Store are both down.
Back Soon

(more…)